Dirty warfare ignored by mainstream as Egypt votes

30 November 2011 — RT

Cairo : Election officials take away ballot boxes from a polling station near Tahrir square at the end of the voting day in Cairo on November 29, 2011. (AFP Photo / Odd Andersen)

Millions of Egyptians have voted in the first parliamentary election since the fall of President Mubarak. But many doubt whether it will change much, with the army generals who took over from the ousted president still holding the reins.

Authorities report unexpectedly high turnout reaching an estimated 70 to 80 per cent over the two days of voting. Some lines to the polling stations were several kilometers long.

Five of the 10 Egyptian provinces have voted in the first round of the election. The country’s supreme election commission counts 17.5 million voters in those territories, with the total throughout Egypt number reaching more than 50 million.

Some 1,000 complaints over violations have been filed, most over polling stations being unable to process all those who wanted to cast ballots due to shortages of ink and blank ballot papers. Doctors reported that some three dozen people, mostly elderly, required medical assistance. One person died from a cardiac arrest.

The voting was marred by violence on Tuesday night, when nearly 80 people were wounded in clashes focused around a Cairo sit-in protest by activists demanding an end to army rule, Reuters reported.

The next round of Egyptian election will take place on December 14-15. The third will be on January 3-4.

The joy of people participating in Egypt’s future was palpable. But some say the election excitement and dreams of democracy could be overshadowing a harsh reality.

They may be excited to be voting in a real election for real candidates, but they are electing a parliament that will have no power. The question is, does that make this part of a real transition from the old regime?

“The problem is it’s going to produce a parliament that cannot appoint ministers, that cannot appoint a government. Whose constitution, whatever it turns out to be, is going to be guided by the army,”
says Robert Fisk, Mid-East correspondent for The Independent newspaper.

Some who understand this boycotted the poll, like Samira Ibrahim, a protester who knows all too well the old tactics are still rampant. A virginity test was performed on her and other women that protested on Tahrir Square long after Mubarak fell.

She would not elaborate on the embracing procedure, but has something to say about the vote:

“The main reason for holding the elections is for the military to hide their corruption and crimes,”
she believes.

Instead of voting, a group of protesters marched to call for justice and show solidarity for virginity test victims. There were few cameras and no Egyptian press.

Fisk says the truth about the Egyptian elections is simple and unpleasant: “It remains a fact that both before during and after this election the ruler of Egypt is an unelected man called Field Marshall Mohamed Tantawi, and as long as he’s unelected this is not a democracy.”

The West was quick to praise the election as a great step towards change. Which was quite expectable, Fisk says.

“Although the Americans are beginning to say ‘well, no, the army must go back to barracks,’ deep down they’ll be perfectly happy to keep the army where it is in Egypt. If you give $1.3 billion a year to the Egyptian Army, which the Americans do, you expect it to do what it wants,”
he explained.

This leaves little room for the people to get what they want, and Egypt might be waking up from more of a nightmare than a sweet dream of democracy once election elation settles.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Posted 30th November 2011 by InI in category Egypt

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>