Bradley Manning / Wikileaks Newslinks 8 May 2013
8 May 2013 — williambowles.info
SF Pride’s Bradley Manning Imbroglio Could End Up in Court
SF Weekly (blog)
If Bay Area peaceniks had their druthers, the whole SF Pride Manning-gate imbroglio would end tonight. Pride board members are scheduled to have a meeting at 7 p.m., at which point they’ll probably discuss the issue and make a final decision on whether …
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2013/05/manning-gate_could_be_headed_t.php




Rag Radio
Greenwashgold.org

























So these breakaways from the Socialist Workers Party now join their old comrades in the varied ranks of the revolutionary socialist factions of Britain. Unfortunately, unlike the breakaways who had already adopted the title Communist Party of Britain before the demise of the old CPGB, who try to claim legitimacy as its continuum in the leadership of the working class, these SWP breakaways had to settle for the title of Counterfire.
Never mind! After all, Counterattack wouldn’t really fit an organisation that aims to become the great umbrella over all the other reformist/revolutionary umbrellas such as Benn’s ‘support the Labour Party’ Coalition of Resistance and McCluskey’s ‘support the TUC‘ The People’s Agenda’, not to mention the ‘bring our heroes home‘ Stop the War Coalition’.
Rather than working for the unity of politically advanced workers, this faction in ‘Change from below’ seeks to be recognised as the leadership of the working class – by working bottom up from the top down. With this, instead of the state of the capitalist class being replaced by the state of the working class, it will be replaced by a “new order based on mass democratic assemblies”.
For the lower phase of communism, what’s wrong with a revolutionary social democratic state and the practice of democratic centralism rather than the long-experienced, practice of leader centralism?
In ‘A world system in crisis’, rather than referring to US-UK-EU imperialism as being the “clear and present danger to world peace”, and that has to be in particular respect to Conservative/Labour UK since 1945, these ‘revolutionary socialists‘, believe it or not, say that the “militarisation of relations between states” is the cause.
They go on from there to call, not for a cooperative, socialist system to replace the competitive capitalist system, but for a “system based on democracy, equality, planning and human need”, which could have been written by almost anyone in the ranks of Left Labour.