Is the drive for war on Syria to cover up a war crime? By William Bowles

27 August 2013 — williambowles.info

According to the source, Russia’s ambassador in the UN Security Council, Vitaly Churkin, presented conclusive evidence – based on documents and Russian satellite images – of two rockets carrying toxic chemicals, fired from Douma, controlled by the Syrian “rebels”, and landing on East Ghouta. Hundreds of “rebels”, as well as civilians – including those children on the cover of Western corporate media papers – were killed. The evidence, says the Russian source, is conclusive. – Pepe Escobar

Shattering news if indeed it’s true, that it was two missiles fired by rebels from a place called Douma in the suburbs of Damascus, which is indeed under rebel control, that did the damage. No wonder the Empire is in a panic to go to war if it gets out that it was actually the side its arming and supporting that caused such horrendous loss of life!

The mad, panic-driven desire to destroy being exhibited by the USUK maybe the reason for the drive toward war as it will (hopefully) obscure and relegate to history what actually took place. The threat of war on Syria is some terrible psychopathic sideshow and well within the remit of the barbarians, who it is clear will stop at nothing to achieve their objectives. Unless stopped.

If what Escobar reports (and another source, see below) is really true, then it means that the rebels actually did kill hundreds of people, including its own soldiers! Maybe even a thousand or more. No wonder the West doesn’t want it to be investigated! The UN inspection team has no remit to try and find out who is actually responsible, just whether some kind gas attack took place.

All that guff about, ‘it’s too late, Assad has gotten rid of the evidence’ or, ‘you should have let us in earlier’, is just a smokescreen. What the West HAS to do, is try and cover it up, like they did to the thousands of Iraqi troops who were bulldozed in their trenches, alive, buried in sand.

More Confirmation

Below is a short promo of an interview with an Syrian activist confirming the report made by Pepe Escobar above. It’s on the Boiling Frogs website but you need a paid subscription to view the entire video, which is a bit of a drag. And I’d like to see the satellite images and any accompanying information. Why aren’t the Russians making a bigger play of the information they allegedly have? IT could stop this war thing in its tracks!

 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted 27th August 2013 by InI in category Syria, William Bowles

3 thoughts on “Is the drive for war on Syria to cover up a war crime? By William Bowles

  1. Pingback: Syria truth suppressed – Globalresearch down – some references | Rev. Felicity O'Brien speaking as a deacon

  2. Eric Penrose

    Why no available images? I’d guess the Russians don’t want too much dwelt upon regarding their presumed spy satellites even though the US UNSC ambassador seems to have seen it on the day. I haven’t been able to find the article in As-Safir News under assafir.com – this could be because the english search/ ‘Al Monitor’ translation system there is only partial, otherwise perhaps the site since deleted the article because the Russians indicated they don’t want too much attention drawn to their images as this could lead to wider demands of making it available- hence orbit/ resolution. Myself as well, though, I think it is worth them highlighting this- and wouldn’t US anyway have been able to establish which satellite this would have been and already know its path and resolution?

    NB I did find about it at Voice of Russia but only as something mentioned in discussion – this by a former Russian diplomatic – probably based on the As-Safir report – or a further confirmation.
    Eric

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>