21 February 2012 — Global Research
THE GLOBAL RESEARCH ONLINE NEWS READER
Global Research announces a new project to our readers – the N-Book Series
Global Research’s Online News Reader (N-Book) aims to take a top story in world events and present the best of our recent archive to give readers a condensed and informed overview of the topic. It will include a mix of news, analysis and backgrounder. In that way, we hope that you can stay informed of the most important developments with this handy authoritative reference. The News Reader (N-Book) will come out regularly as crucial stories unfold.
The first in our new series deals with the rising tensions in the Persian Gulf between the West and Iran and what appears increasingly to be a collision course for war. We examine the heart of the matter in order to empower our readers with knowledge and truth about what is really happening in the region and why, and, more importantly, what is at stake.
By providing a focus on an important current news topic, the GR Online N-Book News Reader complements Global Research’s Online Interactive I-Book Reader, which brings together, in the form of chapters, a collection of Global Research feature articles, including debate and analysis, on a broad theme or subject matter. To consult our Online Interactive I-Book Reader Series, click here.
War Plan Iran
Dispelling the Lies, Telling the Truth about
Western Aggression in the Persian Gulf
Finian Cunningham and Michel Chossudovsky (Editors)
GR Online News Reader Series
N-Book No. 1. 2012, January 16, 2012
Note to Readers:
Remember to bookmark this page for future reference.
Please Forward the GR I-Book far and wide. Post it on Facebook.
[scroll down for I-BOOK Table of Contents]
The year 2012 may become known as a watershed for humanity – the year when mankind was precipitated into a global conflagration involving nuclear weapons. The signs are indeed grimly ominous as formidable military forces converge on the Persian Gulf in the long-running stand-off between the United States and Iran.
On side with the US are its European allies in NATO, primarily Britain, Washington’s Middle East client states: Israel and the Arab monarchies of the Persian Gulf – all bristling with weapons of mass destruction. Recent naval exercises by Iran in the Strait of Hormuz have also displayed a fierce arsenal of missiles and military capability, and Iran has strategic alliances with Russia and China, both of whom will not stand idly by if their Persian partner is attacked.
As we have consistently analysed on Global Research, the conflict between the US-led powers and Iran has wider ramifications. It is part and parcel of Washington’s bid to engineer the social and political upheavals across the Arab World in order to redraw the region in its strategic interests. It is no coincidence that fresh from NATO’s conquest of and regime change in Libya, the focus has quickly shifted to Syria – a key regional ally of Iran. As Michel Chossudovsky has pointed out “the road to Tehran goes through to Damascus”. Regime change in Syria would serve to isolate Iran. Subjugating Iran and returning it to Western tutelage is the prize that Washington and its allies have been seeking for the past 33 years ever since their client the Shah, Mohammad Rez? Pahlavi, was deposed by the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Iran is an energy-rich colossus, with oil and, more importantly, natural gas reserves that put it, with approximately 10% of global reserves, in the world’s top three oil economies alongside Washington’s client states of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. In sharp contrast, the US has less than 2% of global oil reserves.
The conquest of Iran’s oil riches is the driving force behind America‘s military agenda.
The US-led conquest of Iraq – costing over a million lives in a nine-year occupation – is part of Washington’s long-held plans to dominate the globe’s vast energy resources that reside in the Persian Gulf and Central Asian regions. The decade-long war in Afghanistan is another flank in this US bid for hegemony over the fuel for the capitalist world economy. For nearly three decades, the US-led Western capitalist world has been deprived of exploiting Iranian energy wealth. The Islamic Republic has remained defiantly independent of Washington’s control, not just in terms of its vast hydrocarbon riches, but also politically. Iran is no puppet of the West as it was formerly under the despotic Shah Mohammad Rez? Pahlavi.
Tehran has shown itself to be a trenchant critic of Western imperialist meddling in the region and fawning over the criminal Israeli persecution of Palestinians. Another important source of Western animus towards Iran and the deeply held desire for regime change is the loss that the Iranian revolution implies for the lucrative American, British and French weapons industry. When Shah Mohammad Rez? Pahlavi was kicked out in February 1979, so too was a massive market for Western arms dealers. The recent $50 billion arms sales to Saudi Arabia – the “biggest-ever in history” – that had the Pentagon salivating, would be easily replicated in Iran, if a similar client regime could be installed there.
From the Western powers’ point of view, Iran is both an elusive prize and a frustrating obstacle. Bringing Iran back into the orbit of Western capitalist control has the added significance of depriving energy and other geopolitical advantages to rival powers, in particular Russia and China. In a strategic review earlier this month, Washington highlighted China as its pre-eminent global competitor in the coming decades. The militarized agenda towards China was also heralded by US President Barack Obama during his Asia-Pacific tour at the end of 2011. China is heavily dependent on Iranian oil. Some 20 per cent of all Iranian crude oil exports are traded with China. The latter has billions of dollars worth of energy investments in Iran, in particular the natural gas sector, which energy analysts view as the primary fuel in forthcoming decades. Washington’s policy of hostility and regime change towards Iran and furthering its hegemony over this vital region is as much about wresting control from its perceived competitors, Russia and China. That factor takes on added importance as America’s economic power wanes.
These issues form the bigger picture that explains the drive for war in the Persian Gulf, which the mainstream media has chosen to carefully ignore. The broader implications of this war are either trivialized or not mentioned. People are led to believe that war is part of a “humanitarian mandate” and that both Iran as well as Iran’s allies, namely China and Russia, constitute an unrelenting threat to global security and “Western democracy”
While the most advanced weapons system are used, America‘s wars are never presented as “killing operations” resulting in extensive civilian casualties. While the incidence of “collateral damage” is acknowledged, US-led wars are heralded as an unquestionable instrument of “peace-making” and “democratization”.
The selection of articles below is intended to give readers a condensed overview of the events and issues at stake in the so-called stand-off between the US, its allies, and Iran. We have selected articles with a news emphasis while also providing a historical background.
In Part I, Playing with Fire: Covert Acts of Aggression, Provocation and War, our reports and analyses show how the military build-up in the Persian Gulf has an alarming deliberation and potential for an all-out regional conflict. We also expose Washington’s criminal covert war against Iran, including the assassination of Iranian scientists and the incursion of the country’s territory with spy drones. However, we don’t merely report the occurrence of these events, our writers show how this mainly US-led militarization is part of the wider strategy for American global dominance.
We also demonstrate in Part II, War-Making is a Crime: The Latest Episode in America’s Long Record, that the belligerent policy of Washington and its allies is criminal. Before even firing a shot, the Western powers are violating international laws and protocols of diplomacy. Equipped with this legal insight and knowledge is essential for citizens to mount an effective anti-war movement. In this section, we also provide a historical background showing that Washington’s hostility towards Iran is but the latest episode in a long history of criminal war-making by the US.
Central to the Western powers’ avowed rationale in the Persian Gulf is their presentation of Iran as a threat to world peace, in particular from its alleged development of nuclear weapons. In Part III, Media Manipulation: Lies, Distortions and Selling Yet Another War to the Public, we dispel the myths, fog and fabrications behind these allegations to show that Iran does not have, nor is intending to build, nuclear weapons. Its “nuclear ambitions” (a phrase so often said with sinister connotations) are to develop civilian energy and medical capabilities – well within the provisions and entitlements of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Countless inspections over several years by the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), have not found any evidence to support Western claims. Yet these well-worn and hollow claims continue to be recycled in the mainstream media. The IAEA has also shown itself to have become a willing political tool for Western governments and intelligence agencies by casting sinister doubt on the Iranian nuclear programme even though the IAEA has not found any proof to justify such doubts. We show that the supposed nuclear threat feared by the Western powers is a specious pretext for their otherwise criminal aggression towards Iran and its 80 million people.
Finally, in Part IV Towards a Global Conflagration, we point to the very real danger of a horrendous cataclysm – if Western governments persist in their criminal drumbeat for war in the Persian Gulf. Russia and China are fully aware that a war on Iran is a stepping stone towards a broader war. The Russian government, in a recent statement, has warned the US and NATO that “should Iran get drawn into any political or military hardships, this will be a direct threat to our national security.”
The region is on a hair-trigger for a conflagration that would involve nuclear weapons and the collision of global powers in what would constitute World War III. The consequences are barely imaginable for the loss of life in such a scenario and for the very future of the planet. Yet all the while, the mainstream media has served to justify this march to war or to downplay its horrific possibilities.
The complacency of Western public opinion –including segments of the US anti-war movement– is disturbing. No concern has been expressed at the political level as to the likely consequences of a US-NATO-Israel attack on Iran, using nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state.
Such an action would result in “the unthinkable”: a nuclear holocaust over a large part of the Middle East. It should be noted that a nuclear nightmare would occur even if nuclear weapons were not used. The bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities using conventional weapons would contribute to unleashing a Chernobyl-Fukushima type disaster with extensive radioactive fallout.
The “Globalization of War” involving the hegemonic deployment of a formidable US-NATO military force in all major regions of the World is inconsequential in the eyes of the Western media.
War is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities. The broader implications of this war on Iran are either trivialized or not mentioned. People are led to believe that war is part of a “humanitarian mandate” and that both Iran as well as Iran’s allies, namely China and Russia, constitute an unrelenting threat to global security and “Western democracy”.
012 could be a watershed year for ominous reasons. It could also be a watershed year for a better future in which citizens rise up to avert war and overthrow their oppressive governments, to create societies that are worthy of human beings. In order to achieve that, we first need to know what is at stake and why. This Online News Reader (N-Book) aims to do that.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Playing with Fire: Covert Acts of Aggression, Provocation and War
|Beating the Drums of War: Provoking Iran into “Firing the First Shot”?
– by Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-01-14
Very few people in America are aware or informed regarding the devastation and massive loss of life which would occur in the case of a US-Israeli sponsored attack on Iran.
|Terror Attacks, U.S.-Israeli War Games Raise the Prospects for War with Iran
– by Tom Burghardt – 2012-01-14
|Assassination in Iran: Obama Administration is CEO of “Murder Inc”
Clinton denies US involvement in murder of nuclear scientist
– by Finian Cunningham – 2012-01-13
|The Geo-Politics of the Strait of Hormuz: Could the U.S. Navy be defeated by Iran in the Persian Gulf?
– by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2012-01-08
The Pentagon’s own war simulations show that a war in the Persian Gulf with Iran would spell disaster for the U.S. Navy.
|FINANCIAL WARFARE: US Sabotage of Iran’s Currency: A New Twist of the Screw to War
– by Finian Cunningham – 2012-01-03
|War Plan Iran: China Snubs Washington’s Best-Laid Plans to Destabilize Iran’s Oil Industry
– by Finian Cunningham – 2012-01-10
|Building Another Pretext to Wage War on Iran: US Court Holds Tehran Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks
$100 billion in damages
– by Dr. Ismail Salami – 2011-12-27
|Downed CIA Stealth Drone Marks Another Step Towards America’s War On Iran
– by Finian Cunningham – 2011-12-07
|Pearl Harbor: 70 Years on, Is Iran the New Japan?
– by Finian Cunningham – 2011-12-08
War-Making is a Crime: The Latest Episode in America’s Long Record
|War Plan Iran: The US Finally Admits Its Criminal Bankruptcy.
– by Finian Cunningham – 2012-01-09
“Are they trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.” says US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta. So if Iran is not even trying to develop a nuclear weapon, what then is the criminal US warmongering predicated on?
|Waging War against Iran is a Criminal Act, in Violation of International Law
The death toll from World War III will be incalculable…
– by Prof. Francis A. Boyle – 2012-01-07
|Manipulation of the UN Security Council in support of the US-NATO Military Agenda
Coercion, Intimidation & Bribery used to Extort Approval from Reluctant Members
– by Carla Stea – 2012-01-10
Media Manipulation: Lies, Distortions and Selling Yet Another War to the Public
|VIDEO: Faking It: How the Media Manipulates the World into War
– by James Corbett – 2012-01-02
The centuries-long history of how media has been used to whip the nation into wartime frenzy, dehumanize the supposed enemies, and even to manipulate the public into believing in causes for war that, decades later, were admitted to be completely fictitious.
|Israel: “Wiped off The Map”. Rumor of the Century, Fabricated by the US Media to Justify An All out War on Iran
– by Arash Norouzi – 2012-01-04
|Using Fake Intelligence to Justify War on Iran
– by Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-11-09
Washington is in the process of concocting a new string of lies pertaining to Iran’s nuclear program with a view to justifying the implementation of punitive bombings.
|Media Manipulation and the Drums of War: How Media is used to Whip the Nation into Wartime Frenzy
– by James Corbett – 2012-01-03
Towards a Global Conflagration
|World War III: The Launching of a Preemptive Nuclear War against Iran
– by Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-12-04
World War III is not front-page news. The mainstream media has excluded in-depth analysis and debate on the implications of these war plans.
|IRAN: The Next War on Washington’s Agenda Politics
– by Dr Paul Craig Roberts – 2012-01-13
|The American-Iranian Cold War in the Middle East and the Threat of A Broader War
– by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya – 2012-01-01
A Cold War between Tehran and Washington has been raging across the Middle East from Lebanon to Iraq and the Persian Gulf with the use of spies, drones, assassinations, and perception campaigns.
|When War Games Go Live. Preparing to Attack Iran. “Simulating World War III”
– by Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-01-08
With ongoing war games on both sides, armed hostilities between the US-Israel led coalition and Iran are, according to Israeli military analysts, “dangerously close”.
|Imperial Military Adventurism: Tensions Rise as the U.S. Imposes the ‘Nuclear Option’ on Iran’s Economy
Blocking oil Shipments through the Strait of Hormuz…
– by Tom Burghardt – 2012-01-02
|Preparing to Attack Iran with Nuclear Weapons: “No Option can be taken off the Table.”
– by Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-12-26
|Red Lines and Ticking Clocks: U.S. War Plans Against Iran
The possibility of Russia’s Military Involvement…
– by Tom Burghardt – 2011-12-26
|012. Failure could Result in a US-Israel Military and Economic Tailspin
– by Patrick Henningsen – 2012-01-05
|Why Not Attack Iran?
Iran will retaliate against U.S. troops and Israel
– by David Swanson – 2012-01-06
|Obama’s New Military Strategy: Targeting Nations which Challenge US Hegemony
– by Stephen Lendman – 2012-01-07
|IMPLOSION OF THE MIDDLE EAST: Destabilizing Iraq and Syria, Recalibrating America’s War Plans directed against Iran
– by Dr. Ismail Salami – 2012-01-06
For more background analysis consult our latest Online Interactive I-Book
|The Globalization of War: The “Military Roadmap” to World War III
ONLINE INTERACTIVE READER
– by Michel Chossudovsky, Finian Cunningham – 2012-01-31
Spread the word, reverse the tide of war, forward the N-Book to friends and family, post on facebook.
We call upon college, university and high school teachers to bring this N-Book to the attention of their students.
The Online News Reader Series is provided free of charge to our readers.
Any amount large or small will contribute to supporting our endeavors.
NEW RELEASE: GLOBAL RESEARCH E-BOOK
Purchase Online directly from Global Research
Towards a World War III Scenario
by Michel Chossudovsky