DEATH by Vaccine “legally considered suicide” French Court Rules

17 January 2022 —

“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide.”

Life Insurance Company Denies Claim of Vax Victim Since Jab is Experimental

NEW YORK — A legal ruling from France highlights the rampant corruption surrounding the COVID-19 tyranny and so-called “vaccines.”

Readers may recall the story earlier this month of alarming data from an Indianapolis insurance company which points to a strong correlation between the introduction of the experimental jabs and a never before seen rise in deaths. Despite that clear correlation, that company’s CEO blamed the unvaxxed and said rates will be going up on companies with unvaxxed workforces.

The lawsuit in France, as reported by Free West Media, again deals with life insurance companies.

A wealthy businessman had a multi-million dollar life insurance policy for his family, and after he passed away the insurance company refused to pay. The man submitted to a shot and was confirmed to have dies from the shot.

The hitch is that on all levels, including legal, the shots are experimental. The insurance company stated the policy clearly states that deaths from experimental medicine are the same as suicide, and it doesn’t need to pay out.

“The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine,” a court ruling stated. “There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.”

The ruling added: “The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”

A lot of details about the case are not included, but as the Free West Media notes, that’s in part because there is no mainstream media reporting on the case.

Although the court found that there is no mandate in France, that comes down to perspective. France does have mandates in place to take part in society, and of course governments around the world are applying at the very least immense amounts of pressure, whether an official mandate edict has been made or not.

While this story comes from overseas, it is certainly something to keep track of because it surely can or will happen in America.

Steve MacDonald, for Granite Grok, wrote: “No one has your back here. The media and politicians swore you should fear for your life when what you might need to fear for is your life insurance.”

In March of 2021, MacDonald was warning about this as the mass jab campaign was in its infancy.

“If you’re rushing to get in line for the experimental COVID19 vaccine or are on the fence, you may want to take a step back,” MacDonald wrote. “There are known side-effects, including death, and most insurers need not pay benefits. You did, after all, volunteer to take an unapproved chemical injection.”

So, what could eventually play out is that insurance companies, like that from Indianapolis, could hike your rates if you refuse to be a guinea pig but then in turn refuse to pay out for any guinea pigs who are victims of the experimentation.

11 thoughts on “DEATH by Vaccine “legally considered suicide” French Court Rules

  1. barovsky says:

    Okay, I’m pretty sure this story is essentially correct and it’s down to the insurance company that doesn’t want to pay out, so the whole thing ends up in court which decides in favour of the insurance company! Hence the ‘suicide’ get-out clause. So the real question is; does the decision have any relevance to the rest of us?

    Like

  2. lorettademple says:

    Hey What is the name of the so called guy that died. What court and date? Always stories but no proof. Maybe I should make up some names, dates about people who died because they were not vaccinated. Keep up the storytelling.

    Like

    • Dawn says:

      Are you saying it’s not true? If you are your real special!! Their is a nationwide investigation going on! Indictments everywhere court cases going on every day? Where do you live under a rock?

      Like

      • barovsky says:

        I’m not saying anything, I just published the article based on the assumption that it’s correct and not fake. One commentator seems to think it’s made up but it’s pretty easy to find out, isn’t it? Though I must say, I’ve not tried.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.