Shock Absorbers: Progressives Stunned by Obama Non-Surprises Chris Floyd

11 February, 2009

There is certainly a great deal of slack-jawed shock going around these days, especially in progressive circles, where pundits, commentators, analysts and kibitzers continually find themselves reeling from yet another ‘inexplicable’ move by the Obama Administration to uphold the core principles of their predecessors: enriching the rich, extending the empire, and enhancing the authoritarian power of a thoroughly militarized state.

For example, Glenn Greenwald and Scott Horton at Harper’s (among many others) are deeply shocked by Team Obama’s draconian maneuvers to quash a court case based on clear, abundant and credible evidence that American security forces — and their corporate accomplices — colluded to inflict horrendous tortures on a gulag captive (whose only ‘crime,’ it turns out, was reading a satirical magazine article). While Horton struggles to find some small justification for what he sees as an unwise decision, Greenwald is scathing and detailed in denouncing Obama’s action, in which the new president seeks to uphold — and to seize for himself — some of the most egregious claims of arbitrary, tyrannical power once advanced by George ‘Unitary Executive’ Bush.

Continue reading

Israel ready to launch a military offensive against Iran By Lech Biegalski

14 February, 2009 – Global Research

In the wake of Gaza, can the world afford to live with a nuclear Israel?

On February 14, Australian News Agency The Age reported:

A SENIOR Israeli diplomat has warned that Israel is ready to launch a military offensive against Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons.

In an interview with The Age, Dan Gillerman, who was Israel’s permanent representative at the United Nations from 2003 until last September, said time for diplomatic efforts to stop Iran acquiring a nuclear capability might have already expired.

“The world cannot afford to live with a nuclear Iran,” Mr Gillerman said.

Continue reading

Venezuela’s Referendum: Media’s Double Standards Steve Rendall & Isabel Macdonald

16 February, 2009

With Sunday’s Venezuelan referendum on term limits, we can expect to hear a lot about Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez’s ‘plan to become president for life’ and its reflection on ‘Venezuela’s battered democracy’–as the New York Times editors put it around the time of Venezuela’s last (failed) term limits referendum.

But when Colombian President Álvaro Uribe’s efforts to lift term limits succeeded in 2005, the U.S. media took little notice, and Uribe’s reputation as the U.S.’s favorite ‘democrat’ in the region remained intact.

Continue reading

Venezuela’s Referendum: Media’s Double Standards Steve Rendall & Isabel Macdonald

16 February, 2009

With Sunday’s Venezuelan referendum on term limits, we can expect to hear a lot about Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez’s ‘plan to become president for life’ and its reflection on ‘Venezuela’s battered democracy’–as the New York Times editors put it around the time of Venezuela’s last (failed) term limits referendum.

But when Colombian President Álvaro Uribe’s efforts to lift term limits succeeded in 2005, the U.S. media took little notice, and Uribe’s reputation as the U.S.’s favorite ‘democrat’ in the region remained intact.

Continue reading

Venezuela: Luis Bilbao — Reasons to be on alert after the referendum victory

Translated by Federico Fuentes

14 February, 2009 — A string of provocations in the days leading up to the constitutional amendment referendum points to the employment of a disturbance plan that could well be followed up with destabilisations attempts after the poll.

Amongst many other things – it would be too tedious to enumerate them all — those that stand out are the violent actions of pro-opposition student groups, the circulation of a counterrevolutionary proclamation amongst Armed Forces officers, the self-attack on a synagogue, the announcement of a trip by Lech Walesa (ex-Polish leader, dependent on the Vatican and the CIA) to coincide with the electoral event and the provocation by Spanish deputy Luis Herrero, from the fascist Popular Party, who on arriving in Caracas as an international observer issued harmful declarations, knowing full well that this would be result in his expulsion by the National Electoral Court.

Continue reading

Video: The Free Gaza Movement, February 2009

The Free Gaza Movement is a human rights group that in August 2008 sent the first international boats to land in the port of Gaza in 41 years. We want to break the siege of Gaza. We want to raise international awareness about the prison-like closure of the Gaza Strip and pressure the international community to review its sanctions policy and end its support for continued Israeli occupation.

http://widgets.vodpod.com/w/video_embed/Groupvideo.2098684

Posted with vodpod


Wikileaks slams arrest; releases latest Afghan death data

16 February, 2009

A confidential NATO report issued last month reveals that civilian deaths from the war in Afghanistan have increased by 46% over the past year.

The 12 page report was authenticated and released today in full by the transparency group Wikileaks.

The report shows a dramatic escalation of the war and civil disorder. Coalition deaths increased by 35%, assassinations and kidnappings by 50% and attacks on the Kabul based Government of Hamid Karzai also more than doubled, rising a massive 119%.

Other significant NATO/International Security Assistance Force figures from the 2009 report are:

  • IED related attacks rose 27% and deaths 29%.
  • Rifle and rocket fire increased 40%.
  • Surface to air fire increased 67%.

Outside of the capital Kabul:

  • Only one in two families had access to even the most basic health care
  • Only one in two children had access to a school

Earlier this month a British Army officer, Colonel McNally, was arrested for passing civilian death toll figures for 2006-2007 to Human Rights Watch analyst and former BBC radio reporter Rachel Reid. Human Rights Watch published a report based around the data last September.

The London Times, stated that American military officials were “seething” over the leaks.

According to a UK Ministry of Defence source in the Daily Mail:

“What McNally passed on will not cost lives in the sense that it doesn’t give specific military details. But the whole point of defeating the Taliban is winning hearts and minds and stopping the population joining their cause. If they think we’re lying to them, it could become a very dangerous place. This has caused a diplomatic row and the Americans are not happy at all.”

Wikileaks legal spokesperson Jay Lim said “We deplore the arrest of Colonel McNally for revealing civilian death figures. It is clear that Col. McNally’s actions are of the highest moral calibre.”

NATO is not likely to find Wikileaks’ source so readily. The site uses state of the art anonymization technologies, and the identity of its sources are protected under the Swedish Press Freedom Act.

In January Wikileaks quashed a South African Government criminal investigation after warning it would seek to have the prosecutors charged and extradited to face trial before Swedish courts.

For more information, see:

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/A1