Wikileaks News Roundup 7-8 December, 2010

8 December, 2010 — creative-i.info

Live Web Event – The End Of The Free Internet

8 December, 2010 — The Real News Network

Schedule Change

8:00pm – 8:15pm EST Paul Jay
8:15pm – 9pm EST Amazon take down of Wikileaks – Is the free internet dead?
9:00pm – 9:30pm EST Post 911 World – Coleen Rowley and Peter Dale Scott
9:45pm – 10:30pm EST Media and Politics – Jeff Cohen
10:30pm -11:30pm EST Constitutional Rights – Michael Ratner
11:30pm – midnight EST Danny Glover

Click here for the full schedule

Who

Moderator:
Paul Jay, Senior Editor, The Real News Network
Panelists:
Tim Bray, Co-Inventor of XML and Former Director of Web Technologies at Sun Microsystems
Rebecca Parsons, Chief Technology Officer, ThoughtWorks, Inc.
Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University

Live video

Click here during live broadcast to see video

What

Paul Jay, senior editor of The Real News Network, will moderate a virtual panel discussion promoting a dialogue for the technology community about the technological and legal ramifications of the WikiLeaks shutdown.

Topics to be discussed include:

What does the cut off of service to WikiLeaks mean for the future of the Internet?
Will digital journalism be less protected?
Was WikiLeaks afforded procedural protections before its website and DNS entries were shut down? What process should be required?
The Internet is vulnerable to internal threats. What technical innovations are needed?
Can leaks ever be stopped? Is it worth the price?

Logistics

Where: Live at www.therealnews.com
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Time: 8:15 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. EST

Black Agenda Report 8 December, 2010: Obama: GOP Interlocutor / Celebrating Secession / Tyler Perry's Crimes

8 December, 2010 — Black Agenda Report

Obama: The Republican’s Reliable Interlocutor

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
It was an ugly performance by “an unrepentant, unreconstructed, center-right, corporate operative,” as President Obama defended his “latest grand accommodation with the GOP.” But it is incorrect to say that Obama “caves” to Republicans. His m.o. is far more aggressive – against fellow Democrats, whom he has relentlessly pummeled since his first days in office. With Obama in the White House, who needs Republicans?

Read more

Celebrating Secession

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley
Frederick Douglass and other abolitionists welcomed the Civil War, and John Brown gave his life attempting to kindle the armed conflict as the only route to freedom for the slave. Rather than denounce the very idea of celebrating the 150th anniversary of arguably the only “good” war the United States ever fought, African Americans should be planning their own festivities. “It was not just Lincoln’s determination to preserve the Union that defeated the South, but the determination of black Americans to bring about their own liberation.”

Read more

Continue reading

The Empire strikes back By William Bowles

8 December, 2010

Is Julian Assange a brave fool, foolishly brave or just naive?

Of course it’s unthinkable that the Empire will stand by and allow such a challenge and as more is revealed about Assange’s casual encounter with a couple of babes in Sweden (who turned out to be ‘honey-traps’), it tells us just as much about Assange as it does about what the Empire will do. One thing Assange isn’t is a politician and it’s also clear that he is more than a little naive about the enemy he has challenged so brazenly. No wonder then that he ended up in the slammer.

At the time of the original charges against Assange it was obvious that Assange was being setup for a fall should he be foolish enough to release the cables and even though the charges were immediately dropped by Sweden’s top prosecutor, the die was cast for future attacks on Assange. Not that it makes much difference, there are now nearly 750 Websites mirroring the content.

All the more hypocritical is the situation of the corporate media in the shape of the Guardian and the New York Times that still release cables on a daily basis even as Assange languishes in a British slammer.

But then aren’t we all more than a little naive about what our governments will do in order to maintain the status quo? Taking out a sprat like Assange is small change compared to selling monstrous invasions under the pretext of ‘defending free speech and democracy’!

Yet there is something earth-changing about the release of these cables because it’s never been done before on such a scale. They make the previous Wikileaks releases positively pedestrian by comparison as they reveal not merely the strategies and tactics of the Empire’s servants but the mindset of the Empire’s trusty employees, its diplomats.

One has to go back almost forty years for anything comparable to the publication of US diplomatic cables by Wikileaks, and they were leaked no less than by the New York Times!

I’m talking of course about the Pentagon Papers that blew the lies on the war in Vietnam, but remember that Daniel Ellsberg was at the time an employee of the US government, one of an army of researchers and analysts without whom the Empire is powerless. Hauled into court by the Nixon administration, he got acquitted. One wonders if Assange, who has already been found guilty by the media, will end up locked away as a ‘terrorist’?

The degree to which the cables have implicated all Western governments in what are clearly war crimes that are global in scope is revealed by the media’s spin on the contents and why they have collectively refused to address these crimes; the media are directly implicated in spinning the lies on behalf of the Empire.

Here’s the BBC’s choice of ‘commentary’ on the leaks published the day after the first cables were released, 29 November and it’s most revealing of the state media’s mindset:

“Libby Purves argues in the Times [subscription required] that Wikileaks threatens to destroy the role of diplomats:”

/../

“…there is real fear that the touchier countries around the world will be outraged. Especially in the Muslim nations, where it seems to be all right for pretty senior voices to refer to us as kuffar, dogs, infidels, etc, whereas the slightest reservation about anything Islamic is considered an atrocity second only to the Crusades.”

ending with:

“…If diplomats no longer dare to send undiplomatic, unvarnished truths to their governments on encrypted cables, the world’s peace will be in more danger.”

And not a moment too soon by looks of it but okay, that sets the tone for the following:

“Blake Hounshell in Foreign Policy calls the leaks troubling:”

But follows this with:

“”[T]he likelihood is that the vast majority of material being hurled into the limelight by the insouciant Mr Assange will not reveal any actual treacheries or scandals. It will consist mainly of what diplomats call ‘frank assessments’.”

And ends with:

“”sometimes too much media attention can get in the way of quiet progress, as in the Arab-Israeli conflict.””

Progress? The predictable ultra-right Mr Boot would like to put his boot into the media for printing anything at all!

“Max Boot in Commentary magazine condemns newspapers’ involvement with the leak:”

“”We now seem to have reached a moment when the West’s major news organizations, working hand in glove with a sleazy website, feel free to throw spitballs at those who make policy and those who execute it. This is journalism as pure vandalism. If I were responsible, I would feel shame and embarrassment. But apparently, those healthy emotions are in short supply these days.””

The ‘light entertainment review follows where we read:

“In contrast Benedict Brogan argues in the Telegraph that the leaks are embarrassing but not serious:”

Adding:

“The Wikileaks story is great fun. The embarrassment of others always is. But however much the Guardian, the New York Times and Julian Assange assure us that this represents a shattering blow to every assumption we hold about foreign relations, the fact remains that it’s a collection of little substance that will do nothing to reshape geo-politics.”

And just to remind us (again) just how lucky we are in the West to have a ‘free’ press:

“Writing on the website Arabist Issandr El Amrani says that while this may not reveal anything new for the US, the leaks are still significant [for the Arab world]”

And finally, one commentary that kind of addresses one of the substantive issues revealed by the release of the cables, the role of the media:

“The chief executive of Index on Censorship John Kampfner makes a prediction in the Independent about how Wikileaks will prompt changes in the law:

“Once this latest flurry is over, prepare for the backlash. Mr Assange’s industrial-scale leaking may lead to legislation in a number of countries that makes whistle-blowing harder than it already is. Perhaps the most curious aspect of the Wikileaks revelations is not that they have happened, but it took someone as mercurial as Mr Assange to be the conduit. Rather than throwing stones, newspapers should be asking themselves why they did not have the wherewithal to hold truth to power.” — ‘Daily View: Wikileaks release‘, BBC News Website, 29 November, 2010

But even here, it’s not the contents per se but why it took a ‘mercurial’ (not to mention ‘insoucient’ and ‘sleazy’) Assange to do it and not the media, but Mr Kampfner even blows this by saying that the leaks will make blowing the whistle more difficult? Even I can see the paradox here. Though what’s mercurial about Assange I have no idea (could it be his pale countenance?), except to say that he seems to be a very low-key, laid back guy, though he obviously likes his ‘extra-mural activities’ as he wanders around the planet, and so what!

But you get the drift, Index on Censorship is included to give the BBC’s selection of comments the illusion of impartiality but the drift is that either the releases are dangerous or that they’re foolish, or both. Nowhere is the issue of policy raised, the general drift is about how embarrassing or dangerous the cables are to individuals or governments, not how dangerous these governments are to us.

So for example, there is not one mention in any of the fifty or so BBC stories on the cables that refers to the US involvement in Georgia’s attack on South Ossetia in 2008 and the reason is not far away when you look at the BBC’s craven coverage of the attack.

“US deputy ambassador Alejandro Wolff said…Russia had invaded Georgia and was “dismembering” Georgia.” — ‘Putin blames US for Georgia role ‘, BBC News Website, 28 August, 2008.)

BBC television news aped the official view including broadcasting the video that purportedly showed a Russian invasion of Georgia when the opposite was true, it was Georgia invading South Ossetia, something that the US diplomats knew was happening.

“According to the cable of the US embassy in Georgia, ‘OSCE observers indicated that Georgian forces along with GRAD artillery are on the move, either as part of a show of force or readiness, or both.’

“The US diplomats had an impression that ‘Georgians are deploying troops to positions in Georgian territory to the south of the Zone of Conflict [a demilitarized buffer zone].’ They were in ‘a heightened state of readiness in order to show their resolve,’ the cable alleges.” ‘US embassy knew Georgians “moved forces” to South Ossetian border – WikiLeaks

As I said in an earlier piece, I think Assange was more than a little naive about exactly what he could get away with and I cautioned that caution was the best strategy when it came to dealing with the Empire. After all, it’s not the editors of the Guardian and the New York Times who are sitting in jail now but Assange.

Addendum: See also the BBC’s page of cable ‘highlights’, that the BBC claims represent “key revelations” contained in the cables:

At a glance: Wikileaks cables, 9 December, 2010

Wikileaks Mirror Sites

8 December, 2010 — Wikileaks mirror sites

This page is a mirror of an original at wikileaks website – http://wikileaks.ch/mirrors.html It will be updated each day as new mirror website are established.

Wikileaks is currently under heavy attack.

In order to make it impossible to ever fully remove Wikileaks from the Internet, you will find below a list of mirrors of Wikileaks website and CableGate pages.

If you want to add your mirror to the list, see our Mass Mirroring Wikileaks page

Mirror List

Continue reading

Wikileaks Mirror Sites

8 December, 2010 — Wikileaks mirror sites

For those of you not familiar with a Mirror Site, they are exact copies of the original site and updated as and when the original gets updated. Clicking on any of the 748 links below will take you instantly to a ‘mirror image’ of the original. Neat eh and something the Empire with all its power just doesn’t understand.

http://wikileaks.ch/mirrors.html

Wikileaks is currently under heavy attack.

In order to make it impossible to ever fully remove Wikileaks from the Internet, you will find below a list of mirrors of Wikileaks website and CableGate pages.

If you want to add your mirror to the list, see our Mass Mirroring Wikileaks page

Mirror List follows:

Continue reading

Wikileaks: Power, Propaganda, and the Global Political Awakening By Andrew Gavin Marshall

7 December, 2010 — Global Research

Introduction

The recent release of the 250,000 Wikileaks documents has provoked unparalleled global interest, both positive, negative, and everywhere in between. One thing that can be said with certainty: Wikileaks is changing things.

There are those who accept what the Wikileaks releases say at face value, largely due to the misrepresentation of the documents by the corporate-controlled news.

There are those who see the documents as authentic and simply in need of proper interpretation and analysis.

Then there are those, many of whom are in the alternative media, who approach the leaks with caution and suspicion.

Continue reading

Glasgow against education cuts

8 December, 2010

LAST MINUTE UPDATES

The demonstration at 12:00 (noon) today at Glasgow University is still going ahead. Please come down for some company, training and so on. Join this, or your nearest demonstration, if there is no large event going on at your own institution. THIS IS IN JUST OVER AN HOUR, GET YOUR WELLIES ON.

Could any students, academics or lay persons willing to give a quick informal talk some time today on some aspect of education, austerity, cuts, neoliberalism, posmodernism, Keynesian Economics, Hayek, social movements, social struggle, Reaganomics, Marxism, media representation, strike histories, capitalist geographies/gentrification etc please get in contact at this address: glasgowagainsteducationcuts@gmail.com. It would be great if you could support us today. Please distribute this email.

The demonstration at 12:00 (noon) TOMORROW at Buchanan St is still going ahead. We are hoping for good numbers.

The demonstration at 4pm TOMORROW in Edinburgh is still going ahead, weather permitting: transport arrangements will be updated as often as we can.

Thank you for your time, even if you are not coming down today, please stay updated of the next 48 hours proceedings via these regular mail-outs, as well as at http://glasgowagainsteducationcuts.wordpress.com

best wishes, stay warm,

Glasgow Against Education Cuts, GAEC

MasterCard, Visa shut down electronic donations to WikiLeaks By Stephen C. Webster

7 December, 2010 — Raw Story

EXCLUSIVE UPDATE: Mobile payments firm Xipwire, Inc. steps up to aid WikiLeaks

mastercardvisa MasterCard, Visa shut down electronic donations to WikiLeaksThe Philadelphia, PA-based mobile payments firm Xipwire, Inc. said Tuesday that it would act as an intermediary for WikiLeaks after the world’s largest credit card providers halted all electronic donations to the non-profit media outlet.

“We do think people should be able to make their own decisions as to who they donate to,” Xipwire co-founder Sibyl Lindsay told Raw Story during a Tuesday afternoon telephone interview. “The fact that people can’t donate to where they’d like to and make that decision for themselves does bother us.”

The company has set up a page where WikiLeaks supporters can donate, saying it will waive all related fees.

Continue reading

Wikileaks under attack: the definitive timeline By Charles Arthur

7 December, 2010 — URUK Net

Since Wikileaks released the US embassy cables on 28 November it has come under pressure on several fronts, from DDoS attacks to frozen bank accounts. We list the companies, politicians and organisations making life difficult for Wikileaks and Julian Assange

On Sunday 28 November Wikileaks began releasing the first of its 250,000 leaked US embassy cables. Almost immediately, a hacking attack known as a ‘DDOS’ – distributed denial of service – attack tried to knock it off the net. These are the attacks that have followed in the succeeding days.

Continue reading

Wikileaks arrest: Julian Quixote By Eric Walberg

8 December, 2010 — Eric Walberg

ellsberg.jpgAn epic drama is unfolding after the Wikileaks founder gave himself up to Scotland Yard, but will Assange suffer the fate of Ellsberg or Pollard, asks Eric Walberg

It was United States president Woodrow Wilson who called for “open diplomacy” — number one of his fourteen points in 1918 — so that “diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view.” He would surely approve of Wikileaks’ efforts at open diplomacy, though current US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called them “an attack on America’s foreign-policy interests” and indeed on “the international community”, though she failed to specify which particular community members were the victims, or what they were the victims of.

On 7 December, the bane of US empire voluntarily gave himself up to Scotland Yard and will face trial and extradition to Sweden possibly by the end of the year, accused of “rape, unlawful coercion and two counts of sexual molestation”, alleged to have been committed in August 2010. The trumped-up cases involve consensual relations, one an obvious “honey trap” by a CIA plant and the other a spurned Lewinsky-like groupie.

Continue reading