28 March, 2010 — Stop NATO
U.S. and NATO military expansion along Russia’s western and southern flanks diminishes the need for Cold War era nuclear arsenals and long-range delivery systems appreciably. Washington can well afford to reduce the number of its nuclear weapons and still maintain decisive worldwide strategic superiority, especially with the deployment of an international interceptor missile system, unilateral militarization of space, and super stealth strategic bombers and the Pentagon’s Prompt Global Strike plans for conventional warheads with the velocity and range of intercontinental ballistic missiles to destroy other nations’ nuclear forces with non-nuclear attacks.
On March 26th U.S. President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev reached an agreement on a successor to the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START 1) of 1991.
The new accord, if it is ratified by the U.S. Senate, will reportedly reduce U.S. and Russian active nuclear weapons by 30 per cent and effect a comparable reduction in the two nations’ delivery systems: Intercontinental ballistic missiles, strategic long-range bombers and ballistic missile submarines.
After a phone conversation between the two heads of state to ‘seal the deal,’ Obama touted it as ‘the most comprehensive arms control agreement in nearly two decades.’ [1]
Continue reading this post...
MichaelKenny 14:18 on March 28, 2010 Permalink
Not a bad analysis, but the last paragraph is absurd. The idea that any European country dreams of “going back” to the colonial era is just plain silly! Americans never seem to be able to get their heads around the idea of a world in perpetual movement, where things don’t just go around in a permanent circle. Also, as he has done in other articles, the author falls into the “America always wins” trap. Both of those are aspects of the now discredited “end of history” theory.